I work in the software industry. It is an industry standard for software to go through different versions over time. The idea is to improve the program with each release, but that isn’t always the case. Just look at the bad press that Windows Vista has received since it was released.

Likewise, our nation has undergone several versions. It began with a beta release on July 4th, 1776 and progressed to version 1.0 on March 1st, 1781, when the Articles of Confederation were ratified. As is common with initial releases, what looked good on paper didn’t work very well in real life. The thirteen states were sovereign, with a small, toothless federal government. Eventually the flaws led to a convening of the Second Continental Congress and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.

When the ninth state ratified the Constitution on June 21, 1788, America 2.0 was released. This version proved to be much more robust than version 1.0, and it continued, with small patches, for almost 100 years until the crisis of the Civil War. Version 2.0 was coded with strong states and a stronger, but still limited, federal government. Many southern states split from the mother country over the issue of slavery, arguing they had the right to do so under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, and it took years of bloody fighting and two more amendments to bring the nation together again.

President Lincoln’s efforts brought about America, Version 3.0. With the advent of this release, people stopped referring to the United States as separate sovereign states, and began referring to them as a single unified nation. A strengthened federal government took charge of America 3.0, leading the way for the next decades; Americans began to become familiar, if not comfortable, with the federal government dictating what individual states could and could not do.

America 4.0 appeared as part of President Roosevelt’s efforts to ameliorate the Great Depression. This version created a major societal shift, as American citizens went from being largely self-reliant to being largely dependent upon the government for job creation, policies that affected everyday life, and relief from every woe. President Johnson further altered social paradigms with the release of Version 4.5, an expansion of the welfare state with an associated reduction in individual self-reliance.

And now that the House has passed the Senate’s Health Care Reform Act, America 5.0 is almost here. It will begin when President Obama signs the bill into law, effectively taking over one-sixth of the nation’s economy and shouldering the responsibility of providing health care for every individual within its borders. If you are ignorant of American history and America’s founding principles, you might be looking forward to this new version. But I believe America 5.0 will create ever more monolithic government control over state and individual freedoms, as begun in version 3.0. Socialized health care will create fewer services at a higher cost, as every such program has produced in every nation where it has been tried; the only beneficiary will be government officials and bureaucrats, who will now have more control than ever over how Americans–who were meant to be sovereign citizens–may choose to live their daily lives.

Nationalizing health care is a dramatic code rewrite of the ideas put forth in the U.S. Constitution of America 2.0 about individual freedoms and responsibilities, but with the passing of the health care bill, Version 5.0 will be the law of the land. The question remains whether this will be a good change or a bad one. Looking at the way other nations have changed with the adoption of socialized medicine, I believe this change will be far worse than those which came before. If you think Windows Vista got nasty reviews, wait until you discover the “undocumented features” of America 5.0.

As much as certain people try to claim that Microsoft has a monopoly on operating systems, there are alternatives available to those who want them. The computer software market allows you to go with the competition if you dislike the current market leader. But when government controls your health care, who can you turn to when a bureaucrat decides your health, or even your life, is expendable? As messy and crazy as a free-market health care system can be, it allows for individual choice. But when the government is the only choice, you get one-size-fits-all care or nothing at all. That doesn’t seem like much of an upgrade.

I took advantage of the FaxZero.com site to send the following fax to my Representative in the House:

Mr. Inslee,

Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

The majority of American voters are against having one-sixth of our economy taken over by the government. Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

The bill is not about reducing the cost of health care for Americans. Every time and in every place where socialized medicine has been instituted, it has led to an *increase* in costs and a reduction in services. Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

The bill will not fix our troubled health care system. It will only exacerbate the problems that were caused by government meddling in the first place. Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

The bill has little to do with “fixing” our health care system and everything to do with seizing power over this nation’s economy and the individual liberties of American citizens. Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

The bill will require everyone to pay for abortion on demand, regardless of our religious beliefs regarding elective abortions. This is government force overriding individual religious convictions, and it is unconstitutional. Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

If you vote against the Health Care Reform bill, this registered Republican will vote for you in November and encourage everyone I know to do likewise, because you will have proven yourself to be a man of honor. But if you vote for the Health Care Reform bill, I will mobilize and do everything legally in my power to see that you are not reelected this November.

Do ***NOT*** vote for the Health Care Reform bill!

Think he’ll get the message?

Since this is a pretty liberal district, I’m sure he will vote in favor of the bill. I’ve never voted for him before, but a No vote on this bill would be sufficient in itself for me to vote for him this November.

I noticed that the Drudge Report linked to this news item:

While White House spokesman Robert Gibbs today refrained from telling reporters whether President Obama in his speech Wednesday night will set a deadline for passing health care reform, sources tell ABC News that in his private meeting with Democratic congressional leaders this afternoon the key word was urgency.

The president told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., that it is important for them to pass health care reform bills soon, the sources said.

Both leaders told the president that despite the difficult rough and tumble of the legislative process in the last few weeks, they are optimistic that both the House and Senate can pass health care reform legislation.

What will be in the bill remains an open question, though after the meeting, Reid told reporters that “we’re going to do our very best to have a public option or something like a public option before we finish this work.” [Emphasis mine - CM]

Health care is soooooo broken that liberals have gotta pass something and fast! They don’t know what’s in the bill, but they have got to get it passed and into the President’s hands as soon as possible to save their political bacon to save health care in America.

Is health care in trouble? Certainly! But the problems in our health care is almost all of our government’s making. Every time health care has had a problem, government stepped in and fixed it. And when their meddling inevitably caused more problems, government stepped in to fix it again, and on and on, as I’ve already written about. The current massive push by the Democrats is just the latest of the government meddling in health care, and it will fix it just like all the previous fixes did.

Albert Einstein is credited with defining insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Every time our government has messed with health care, the government has succeeded in making it worse. Every time a nation has established socialized medicine, the quality of care has gone down, the waiting time has gone up, and the increased cost has been paid by the people.

We don’t actually have a finished health care bill that we can look over and debate, but we need to pass it, and pass it now. And though it has never worked before, the Democrats are sure it will work this time.